1964 Abarth Mono 1000 vs. 2000 Lada 110
To start off, 2000 Lada 110 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth Mono 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth Mono 1000 would be higher. At 1,977 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Lada 110 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Lada 110 weights approximately 510 kg more than 1964 Abarth Mono 1000.
Because 1964 Abarth Mono 1000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Abarth Mono 1000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Lada 110, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Abarth Mono 1000 | 2000 Lada 110 | |
| Make | Abarth | Lada |
| Model | Mono 1000 | 110 |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 982 cc | 1977 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 1070 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 4270 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2500 mm |
