1964 Abarth Mono 1000 vs. 2002 Mahindra Armada
To start off, 2002 Mahindra Armada is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth Mono 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth Mono 1000 would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Mahindra Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Mahindra Armada (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1964 Abarth Mono 1000. (59 HP @ 6600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Mahindra Armada should accelerate faster than 1964 Abarth Mono 1000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Mahindra Armada weights approximately 1440 kg more than 1964 Abarth Mono 1000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Mahindra Armada is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Abarth Mono 1000. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mahindra Armada will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Abarth Mono 1000 | 2002 Mahindra Armada | |
Make | Abarth | Mahindra |
Model | Mono 1000 | Armada |
Year Released | 1964 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 982 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 2000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 4310 mm |