1964 Abarth Mono 1000 vs. 2003 Westfield ZEI
To start off, 2003 Westfield ZEI is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth Mono 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth Mono 1000 would be higher. At 1,298 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Westfield ZEI is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Westfield ZEI (173 HP @ 9800 RPM) has 114 more horse power than 1964 Abarth Mono 1000. (59 HP @ 6600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Westfield ZEI should accelerate faster than 1964 Abarth Mono 1000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Westfield ZEI weights approximately 110 kg more than 1964 Abarth Mono 1000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Abarth Mono 1000 | 2003 Westfield ZEI | |
Make | Abarth | Westfield |
Model | Mono 1000 | ZEI |
Year Released | 1964 | 2003 |
Engine Size | 982 cc | 1298 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 173 HP |
Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 9800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 670 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 3550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2340 mm |