1964 Abarth Mono 1000 vs. 2006 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2006 Dodge Ram is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth Mono 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth Mono 1000 would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Dodge Ram (216 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 157 more horse power than 1964 Abarth Mono 1000. (59 HP @ 6600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1964 Abarth Mono 1000.
Because 2006 Dodge Ram is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Abarth Mono 1000. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Dodge Ram will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Dodge Ram (319 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 228 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Abarth Mono 1000. (91 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2006 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Abarth Mono 1000.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Abarth Mono 1000 | 2006 Dodge Ram | |
Make | Abarth | Dodge |
Model | Mono 1000 | Ram |
Year Released | 1964 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 982 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 216 HP |
Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 91 Nm | 319 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 6350 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1880 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 4080 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 68 L |