1964 Abarth Mono 1000 vs. 2010 Holden Calais
To start off, 2010 Holden Calais is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth Mono 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth Mono 1000 would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Holden Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Calais (344 HP) has 285 more horse power than 1964 Abarth Mono 1000. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Calais should accelerate faster than 1964 Abarth Mono 1000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Calais (530 Nm) has 439 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Abarth Mono 1000. (91 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Calais will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Abarth Mono 1000.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Abarth Mono 1000 | 2010 Holden Calais | |
Make | Abarth | Holden |
Model | Mono 1000 | Calais |
Year Released | 1964 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 982 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 344 HP |
Torque | 91 Nm | 530 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |