1964 Abarth OT vs. 1952 Allard K2
To start off, 1964 Abarth OT is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Abarth OT (154 HP @ 7600 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 1952 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Abarth OT should accelerate faster than 1952 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Allard K2 weights approximately 410 kg more than 1964 Abarth OT.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Abarth OT | 1952 Allard K2 | |
| Make | Abarth | Allard |
| Model | OT | K2 |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1591 cc | 3622 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 154 HP | 85 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 790 kg | 1200 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3580 mm | 4270 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1580 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2700 mm |
