1964 Abarth OT vs. 1962 Austin A 60
To start off, 1964 Abarth OT is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 1,591 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Abarth OT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Abarth OT (154 HP) has 115 more horse power than 1962 Austin A 60. (39 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Abarth OT should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin A 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Austin A 60 weights approximately 328 kg more than 1964 Abarth OT.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Abarth OT | 1962 Austin A 60 | |
| Make | Abarth | Austin |
| Model | OT | A 60 |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1591 cc | 1487 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 154 HP | 39 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 73 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 68.5 mm | 88.9 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 23.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 790 kg | 1118 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3580 mm | 4440 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1610 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2550 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 45 L |
