1964 Abarth OT vs. 1962 Cadillac Sixty
To start off, 1964 Abarth OT is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 1345 kg more than 1964 Abarth OT.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Abarth OT | 1962 Cadillac Sixty | |
| Make | Abarth | Cadillac |
| Model | OT | Sixty |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1591 cc | 6388 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 154 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 101.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 68.5 mm | 98.4 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 790 kg | 2135 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3580 mm | 5650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 3300 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 75 L |
