1964 Abarth OT vs. 1968 Lotus Elan
To start off, 1968 Lotus Elan is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth OT would be higher. At 1,591 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Abarth OT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Abarth OT (154 HP @ 7600 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 1968 Lotus Elan. (104 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Abarth OT should accelerate faster than 1968 Lotus Elan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Abarth OT weights approximately 360 kg more than 1968 Lotus Elan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Abarth OT | 1968 Lotus Elan | |
| Make | Abarth | Lotus |
| Model | OT | Elan |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1591 cc | 1558 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 154 HP | 104 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 790 kg | 430 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3580 mm | 3360 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1430 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1100 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2240 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 45 L |
