1964 Abarth OT vs. 1969 Riley Kestrel
To start off, 1969 Riley Kestrel is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth OT would be higher. At 1,591 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Abarth OT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Abarth OT (154 HP @ 7600 RPM) has 90 more horse power than 1969 Riley Kestrel. (64 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Abarth OT should accelerate faster than 1969 Riley Kestrel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Riley Kestrel weights approximately 120 kg more than 1964 Abarth OT.
Because 1964 Abarth OT is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Abarth OT. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1969 Riley Kestrel, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Abarth OT | 1969 Riley Kestrel | |
| Make | Abarth | Riley |
| Model | OT | Kestrel |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1969 |
| Engine Size | 1591 cc | 1275 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 154 HP | 64 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 5750 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 790 kg | 910 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3580 mm | 3730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1540 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2380 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 25 L |
