1964 Abarth OT vs. 1979 Mitsubishi Celeste
To start off, 1979 Mitsubishi Celeste is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth OT would be higher. At 1,591 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Abarth OT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Abarth OT (154 HP) has 80 more horse power than 1979 Mitsubishi Celeste. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Abarth OT should accelerate faster than 1979 Mitsubishi Celeste. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Mitsubishi Celeste weights approximately 120 kg more than 1964 Abarth OT.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Abarth OT | 1979 Mitsubishi Celeste | |
| Make | Abarth | Mitsubishi |
| Model | OT | Celeste |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1979 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1591 cc | 1410 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 154 HP | 74 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 790 kg | 910 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3580 mm | 4160 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2350 mm |
