1964 Abarth OT vs. 1983 Autobianchi A 112
To start off, 1983 Autobianchi A 112 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth OT would be higher. At 1,591 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Abarth OT is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Abarth OT weights approximately 124 kg more than 1983 Autobianchi A 112.
Because 1964 Abarth OT is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Abarth OT. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Autobianchi A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Abarth OT | 1983 Autobianchi A 112 | |
Make | Abarth | Autobianchi |
Model | OT | A 112 |
Year Released | 1964 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1591 cc | 965 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 154 HP | 0 HP |
Top Speed | 220 km/hour | 150 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 790 kg | 666 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3580 mm | 3280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2050 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 30 L |