1964 Abarth OT vs. 1986 Acura Integra
To start off, 1986 Acura Integra is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth OT would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Acura Integra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Abarth OT (154 HP @ 7600 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 1986 Acura Integra. (125 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Abarth OT should accelerate faster than 1986 Acura Integra.
Because 1964 Abarth OT is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Abarth OT. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Acura Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Abarth OT | 1986 Acura Integra | |
| Make | Abarth | Acura |
| Model | OT | Integra |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1986 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1591 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 154 HP | 125 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 75 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 68.5 mm | 90 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.3:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3580 mm | 4285 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1665 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1290 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2450 mm |
