1964 Abarth OT vs. 1991 Renault Clio

To start off, 1991 Renault Clio is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth OT would be higher. At 1,591 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Abarth OT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Abarth OT (154 HP @ 7600 RPM) has 106 more horse power than 1991 Renault Clio. (48 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Abarth OT should accelerate faster than 1991 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1991 Renault Clio weights approximately 20 kg more than 1964 Abarth OT.

Because 1964 Abarth OT is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Abarth OT. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1964 Abarth OT 1991 Renault Clio
Make Abarth Renault
Model OT Clio
Year Released 1964 1991
Engine Position Rear Front
Engine Size 1591 cc 1108 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 154 HP 48 HP
Engine RPM 7600 RPM 5250 RPM
Engine Bore Size 86 mm 70 mm
Engine Stroke Size 68.5 mm 72 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.5:1 10.0:1
Top Speed 220 km/hour 203 km/hour
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 3 doors
Vehicle Weight 790 kg 810 kg
Vehicle Length 3580 mm 3710 mm
Vehicle Width 1430 mm 1630 mm
Vehicle Height 1390 mm 1410 mm
Wheelbase Size 2030 mm 2550 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 60 L 50 L