1964 Abarth OT vs. 1992 Fiat Vivace
To start off, 1992 Fiat Vivace is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth OT would be higher. At 1,591 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Abarth OT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Abarth OT (154 HP @ 7600 RPM) has 90 more horse power than 1992 Fiat Vivace. (64 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Abarth OT should accelerate faster than 1992 Fiat Vivace. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Fiat Vivace weights approximately 20 kg more than 1964 Abarth OT.
Because 1964 Abarth OT is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Abarth OT. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Fiat Vivace, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Abarth OT | 1992 Fiat Vivace | |
| Make | Abarth | Fiat |
| Model | OT | Vivace |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1992 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1591 cc | 1372 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 154 HP | 64 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 86.4 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 68.5 mm | 55.5 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.1:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 790 kg | 810 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3580 mm | 3750 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2230 mm |
