1964 Abarth OT vs. 1996 Lotus Elise
To start off, 1996 Lotus Elise is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth OT would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Lotus Elise is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Abarth OT (154 HP @ 7600 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 1996 Lotus Elise. (116 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Abarth OT should accelerate faster than 1996 Lotus Elise. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Abarth OT weights approximately 85 kg more than 1996 Lotus Elise. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Abarth OT | 1996 Lotus Elise | |
Make | Abarth | Lotus |
Model | OT | Elise |
Year Released | 1964 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Rear | Middle |
Engine Size | 1591 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 154 HP | 116 HP |
Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 10.5:1 |
Top Speed | 220 km/hour | 197 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 790 kg | 705 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3580 mm | 3730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1150 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2310 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 40 L |