1964 Abarth OT vs. 1996 Seat Marbella
To start off, 1996 Seat Marbella is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth OT would be higher. At 1,591 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Abarth OT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Abarth OT (154 HP @ 7600 RPM) has 114 more horse power than 1996 Seat Marbella. (40 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Abarth OT should accelerate faster than 1996 Seat Marbella. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Abarth OT weights approximately 110 kg more than 1996 Seat Marbella. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1964 Abarth OT is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Abarth OT. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Seat Marbella, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Abarth OT | 1996 Seat Marbella | |
Make | Abarth | Seat |
Model | OT | Marbella |
Year Released | 1964 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1591 cc | 901 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 154 HP | 40 HP |
Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 790 kg | 680 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3580 mm | 3480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1510 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2170 mm |