1964 Abarth OT vs. 1997 Toyota Celica
To start off, 1997 Toyota Celica is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth OT would be higher. At 1,762 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Abarth OT (154 HP @ 7600 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 1997 Toyota Celica. (114 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Abarth OT should accelerate faster than 1997 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Toyota Celica weights approximately 305 kg more than 1964 Abarth OT.
Because 1964 Abarth OT is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Abarth OT. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Toyota Celica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Abarth OT | 1997 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Abarth | Toyota |
Model | OT | Celica |
Year Released | 1964 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1591 cc | 1762 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 154 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 68.5 mm | 78 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 790 kg | 1095 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1760 mm |