1964 Abarth OT vs. 2000 Alpina B3
To start off, 2000 Alpina B3 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth OT would be higher. At 3,299 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Alpina B3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Alpina B3 (301 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 147 more horse power than 1964 Abarth OT. (154 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Alpina B3 should accelerate faster than 1964 Abarth OT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Alpina B3 weights approximately 690 kg more than 1964 Abarth OT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Abarth OT | 2000 Alpina B3 | |
| Make | Abarth | Alpina |
| Model | OT | B3 |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1591 cc | 3299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 154 HP | 301 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 6300 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 87 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 68.5 mm | 93.8 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 790 kg | 1480 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3580 mm | 4490 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2730 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 88 L |
