1964 Abarth OT vs. 2000 Chevrolet Astro
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Astro is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth OT would be higher. At 4,300 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Astro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Astro weights approximately 397 kg more than 1964 Abarth OT.
Because 2000 Chevrolet Astro is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Abarth OT. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Astro will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Chevrolet Astro has automatic transmission and 1964 Abarth OT has manual transmission. 1964 Abarth OT will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Chevrolet Astro will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Abarth OT | 2000 Chevrolet Astro | |
| Make | Abarth | Chevrolet |
| Model | OT | Astro |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1591 cc | 4300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 154 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 790 kg | 1187 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3580 mm | 4830 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1940 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2790 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 64 L |
