1964 Abarth OT vs. 2000 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2000 Ford Falcon is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth OT would be higher. At 3,984 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Falcon (220 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 66 more horse power than 1964 Abarth OT. (154 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1964 Abarth OT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Falcon weights approximately 728 kg more than 1964 Abarth OT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Abarth OT | 2000 Ford Falcon | |
| Make | Abarth | Ford |
| Model | OT | Falcon |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1591 cc | 3984 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 154 HP | 220 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 92.3 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 68.5 mm | 99.3 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.6:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 790 kg | 1518 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3580 mm | 4910 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1880 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2800 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 59 L |
