1964 Abarth OT vs. 2000 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2000 Ford Ranger is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth OT would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Abarth OT (154 HP @ 7600 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 2000 Ford Ranger. (135 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Abarth OT should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Ranger weights approximately 508 kg more than 1964 Abarth OT.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Abarth OT | 2000 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | Abarth | Ford |
| Model | OT | Ranger |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1591 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 154 HP | 135 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 790 kg | 1298 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3580 mm | 4770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2800 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 55 L |
