1964 Abarth OT vs. 2000 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2000 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth OT would be higher. At 3,946 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Land Rover Range Rover (187 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 1964 Abarth OT. (154 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1964 Abarth OT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 1300 kg more than 1964 Abarth OT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Abarth OT. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Abarth OT | 2000 Land Rover Range Rover | |
Make | Abarth | Land Rover |
Model | OT | Range Rover |
Year Released | 1964 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1591 cc | 3946 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 154 HP | 187 HP |
Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 4750 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 790 kg | 2090 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3580 mm | 4720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2750 mm |