1964 Abarth OT vs. 2000 Lotus M250
To start off, 2000 Lotus M250 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth OT would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Lotus M250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Lotus M250 (176 HP @ 7800 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 1964 Abarth OT. (154 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Lotus M250 should accelerate faster than 1964 Abarth OT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Abarth OT weights approximately 115 kg more than 2000 Lotus M250.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Abarth OT | 2000 Lotus M250 | |
Make | Abarth | Lotus |
Model | OT | M250 |
Year Released | 1964 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Rear | Middle |
Engine Size | 1591 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 154 HP | 176 HP |
Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 7800 RPM |
Top Speed | 220 km/hour | 251 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 790 kg | 675 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3580 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2520 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 72 L |