1964 Abarth OT vs. 2000 Smart Roadster
To start off, 2000 Smart Roadster is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth OT would be higher. At 1,591 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Abarth OT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Abarth OT (154 HP @ 7600 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 2000 Smart Roadster. (81 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Abarth OT should accelerate faster than 2000 Smart Roadster. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Smart Roadster weights approximately 95 kg more than 1964 Abarth OT.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Abarth OT | 2000 Smart Roadster | |
Make | Abarth | Smart |
Model | OT | Roadster |
Year Released | 1964 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Rear | Rear |
Engine Size | 1591 cc | 698 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 154 HP | 81 HP |
Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 66.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 68.5 mm | 67 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.0:1 |
Top Speed | 220 km/hour | 180 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 790 kg | 885 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3580 mm | 3430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1200 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2370 mm |