1964 Abarth OT vs. 2000 Toyota Solara
To start off, 2000 Toyota Solara is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth OT would be higher. At 2,164 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Toyota Solara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Abarth OT (154 HP @ 7600 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 2000 Toyota Solara. (133 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Abarth OT should accelerate faster than 2000 Toyota Solara. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Toyota Solara weights approximately 590 kg more than 1964 Abarth OT.
Because 1964 Abarth OT is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Abarth OT. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Solara, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Abarth OT | 2000 Toyota Solara | |
Make | Abarth | Toyota |
Model | OT | Solara |
Year Released | 1964 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1591 cc | 2164 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 154 HP | 133 HP |
Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 87.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 68.5 mm | 90.9 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 790 kg | 1380 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3580 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2680 mm |