1964 Abarth OT vs. 2001 Ford Econoline
To start off, 2001 Ford Econoline is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth OT would be higher. At 4,194 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Ford Econoline (197 HP @ 4700 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 1964 Abarth OT. (154 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Ford Econoline should accelerate faster than 1964 Abarth OT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford Econoline weights approximately 1535 kg more than 1964 Abarth OT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Abarth OT | 2001 Ford Econoline | |
| Make | Abarth | Ford |
| Model | OT | Econoline |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1591 cc | 4194 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 154 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 4700 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 790 kg | 2325 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3580 mm | 5390 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 2020 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 2060 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 3510 mm |
