1964 Abarth OT vs. 2002 Dodge Neon
To start off, 2002 Dodge Neon is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth OT would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Dodge Neon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Abarth OT (154 HP @ 7600 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 2002 Dodge Neon. (114 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Abarth OT should accelerate faster than 2002 Dodge Neon.
Because 1964 Abarth OT is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Abarth OT. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Dodge Neon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Abarth OT | 2002 Dodge Neon | |
| Make | Abarth | Dodge |
| Model | OT | Neon |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1591 cc | 1796 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 154 HP | 114 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 5750 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3580 mm | 4370 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2650 mm |
