1964 Abarth OT vs. 2002 Rover 75
To start off, 2002 Rover 75 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth OT would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Rover 75 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Abarth OT (154 HP @ 7600 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 2002 Rover 75. (122 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Abarth OT should accelerate faster than 2002 Rover 75. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Rover 75 weights approximately 685 kg more than 1964 Abarth OT.
Because 1964 Abarth OT is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Abarth OT. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Rover 75, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Abarth OT | 2002 Rover 75 | |
Make | Abarth | Rover |
Model | OT | 75 |
Year Released | 1964 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1591 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 154 HP | 122 HP |
Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 68.5 mm | 89.3 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 790 kg | 1475 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3580 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2830 mm |