1964 Abarth OT vs. 2003 Chevrolet TrailBlazer
To start off, 2003 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth OT would be higher. At 4,157 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (269 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 115 more horse power than 1964 Abarth OT. (154 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Chevrolet TrailBlazer should accelerate faster than 1964 Abarth OT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Chevrolet TrailBlazer weights approximately 1310 kg more than 1964 Abarth OT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Abarth OT. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Abarth OT | 2003 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | |
Make | Abarth | Chevrolet |
Model | OT | TrailBlazer |
Year Released | 1964 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1591 cc | 4157 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 154 HP | 269 HP |
Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 790 kg | 2100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3580 mm | 4900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 71 L |