1964 Abarth OT vs. 2003 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2003 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth OT would be higher. At 2,184 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Abarth OT (154 HP @ 7600 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 2003 Nissan X-Trail. (108 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Abarth OT should accelerate faster than 2003 Nissan X-Trail. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Nissan X-Trail weights approximately 970 kg more than 1964 Abarth OT.
Because 2003 Nissan X-Trail is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Abarth OT. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Nissan X-Trail will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Abarth OT | 2003 Nissan X-Trail | |
Make | Abarth | Nissan |
Model | OT | X-Trail |
Year Released | 1964 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1591 cc | 2184 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 154 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 790 kg | 1760 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2540 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 60 L |