1964 Abarth OT vs. 2003 Renault Koleos
To start off, 2003 Renault Koleos is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth OT would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Renault Koleos is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Abarth OT (154 HP @ 7600 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 2003 Renault Koleos. (75 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Abarth OT should accelerate faster than 2003 Renault Koleos. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Renault Koleos weights approximately 971 kg more than 1964 Abarth OT.
Because 2003 Renault Koleos is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Abarth OT. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Renault Koleos will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Abarth OT | 2003 Renault Koleos | |
Make | Abarth | Renault |
Model | OT | Koleos |
Year Released | 1964 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1591 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 154 HP | 75 HP |
Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 790 kg | 1761 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3580 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2740 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 80 L |