1964 Abarth OT vs. 2003 Toyota Condor
To start off, 2003 Toyota Condor is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth OT would be higher. At 2,437 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Toyota Condor is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Abarth OT (154 HP @ 7600 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 2003 Toyota Condor. (108 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Abarth OT should accelerate faster than 2003 Toyota Condor. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Toyota Condor weights approximately 715 kg more than 1964 Abarth OT.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Abarth OT | 2003 Toyota Condor | |
Make | Abarth | Toyota |
Model | OT | Condor |
Year Released | 1964 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1591 cc | 2437 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 154 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 95 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 68.5 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 8.8:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 790 kg | 1505 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2640 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 70 L |