1964 Abarth OT vs. 2004 Mercedes-Benz SL
To start off, 2004 Mercedes-Benz SL is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth OT would be higher. At 4,966 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Mercedes-Benz SL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mercedes-Benz SL (302 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 148 more horse power than 1964 Abarth OT. (154 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mercedes-Benz SL should accelerate faster than 1964 Abarth OT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mercedes-Benz SL weights approximately 1058 kg more than 1964 Abarth OT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Abarth OT | 2004 Mercedes-Benz SL | |
Make | Abarth | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | OT | SL |
Year Released | 1964 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1591 cc | 4966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 154 HP | 302 HP |
Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 97 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 68.5 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 790 kg | 1848 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3580 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2570 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 80 L |