1964 Abarth OT vs. 2004 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2004 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth OT would be higher. At 3,950 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota 4Runner (245 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 91 more horse power than 1964 Abarth OT. (154 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1964 Abarth OT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 1130 kg more than 1964 Abarth OT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Abarth OT | 2004 Toyota 4Runner | |
| Make | Abarth | Toyota |
| Model | OT | 4Runner |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1591 cc | 3950 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 154 HP | 245 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 790 kg | 1920 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3580 mm | 4810 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1880 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1830 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2830 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 87 L |
