1964 Abarth OT vs. 2005 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2005 Ford Ranger is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth OT would be higher. At 2,184 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Abarth OT (154 HP @ 7600 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 2005 Ford Ranger. (104 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Abarth OT should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Ranger weights approximately 533 kg more than 1964 Abarth OT.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Abarth OT | 2005 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | Abarth | Ford |
| Model | OT | Ranger |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1591 cc | 2184 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 154 HP | 104 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 8.6:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 790 kg | 1323 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2990 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 80 L |
