1964 Abarth OT vs. 2005 Suzuki Swift
To start off, 2005 Suzuki Swift is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth OT would be higher. At 1,591 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Abarth OT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Abarth OT (154 HP @ 7600 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 2005 Suzuki Swift. (101 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Abarth OT should accelerate faster than 2005 Suzuki Swift. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Suzuki Swift weights approximately 210 kg more than 1964 Abarth OT.
Because 1964 Abarth OT is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Abarth OT. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Suzuki Swift, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Abarth OT | 2005 Suzuki Swift | |
Make | Abarth | Suzuki |
Model | OT | Swift |
Year Released | 1964 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1591 cc | 1488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 154 HP | 101 HP |
Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 78 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 68.5 mm | 78 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.5:1 |
Top Speed | 220 km/hour | 185 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 790 kg | 1000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3580 mm | 3700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2610 mm |