1964 Abarth OT vs. 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth OT would be higher. At 5,965 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (395 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 241 more horse power than 1964 Abarth OT. (154 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer should accelerate faster than 1964 Abarth OT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer weights approximately 1375 kg more than 1964 Abarth OT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Abarth OT. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Abarth OT | 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | |
| Make | Abarth | Chevrolet |
| Model | OT | TrailBlazer |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1591 cc | 5965 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 154 HP | 395 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 790 kg | 2165 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3580 mm | 4880 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1900 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1850 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2880 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 83 L |
