1964 Abarth OT vs. 2006 Citroen C3
To start off, 2006 Citroen C3 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth OT would be higher. At 1,591 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Abarth OT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Abarth OT (154 HP) has 82 more horse power than 2006 Citroen C3. (72 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Abarth OT should accelerate faster than 2006 Citroen C3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Citroen C3 weights approximately 290 kg more than 1964 Abarth OT.
Because 1964 Abarth OT is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Abarth OT. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Citroen C3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Abarth OT | 2006 Citroen C3 | |
Make | Abarth | Citroen |
Model | OT | C3 |
Year Released | 1964 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1591 cc | 1360 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 154 HP | 72 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 68.5 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
Top Speed | 220 km/hour | 167 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 790 kg | 1080 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3580 mm | 3860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2470 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 45 L |