1964 Abarth OT vs. 2006 Ford E-350
To start off, 2006 Ford E-350 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth OT would be higher. At 5,406 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford E-350 (255 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 101 more horse power than 1964 Abarth OT. (154 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 1964 Abarth OT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford E-350 weights approximately 2066 kg more than 1964 Abarth OT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1964 Abarth OT is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Abarth OT. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford E-350, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Abarth OT | 2006 Ford E-350 | |
Make | Abarth | Ford |
Model | OT | E-350 |
Year Released | 1964 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1591 cc | 5406 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 154 HP | 255 HP |
Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 8.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 790 kg | 2856 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3580 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 2120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 3510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 132 L |