1964 Abarth OT vs. 2006 Mazda 6
To start off, 2006 Mazda 6 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth OT would be higher. At 2,966 cc, 2006 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 6 (216 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 1964 Abarth OT. (154 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1964 Abarth OT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mazda 6 weights approximately 330 kg more than 1964 Abarth OT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1964 Abarth OT is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Abarth OT. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Abarth OT | 2006 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Abarth | Mazda |
Model | OT | 6 |
Year Released | 1964 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1591 cc | 2966 cc |
Horse Power | 154 HP | 216 HP |
Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 790 kg | 1120 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3580 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 68 L |