1964 Abarth OT vs. 2006 Nissan Navara
To start off, 2006 Nissan Navara is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth OT would be higher. At 3,954 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Nissan Navara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Nissan Navara (265 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 111 more horse power than 1964 Abarth OT. (154 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Nissan Navara should accelerate faster than 1964 Abarth OT.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Abarth OT | 2006 Nissan Navara | |
| Make | Abarth | Nissan |
| Model | OT | Navara |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1591 cc | 3954 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 154 HP | 265 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 95.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 68.5 mm | 92 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3580 mm | 5230 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1890 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 3210 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 80 L |
