1964 Abarth OT vs. 2007 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2007 Cadillac CTS is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth OT would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Cadillac CTS (253 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 99 more horse power than 1964 Abarth OT. (154 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1964 Abarth OT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 916 kg more than 1964 Abarth OT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Abarth OT | 2007 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Abarth | Cadillac |
Model | OT | CTS |
Year Released | 1964 | 2007 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1591 cc | 3564 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 154 HP | 253 HP |
Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 68.5 mm | 85 mm |
Top Speed | 220 km/hour | 241 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 790 kg | 1706 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3580 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2890 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 66 L |