1964 Abarth OT vs. 2008 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2008 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth OT would be higher. At 3,960 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 780 kg more than 1964 Abarth OT.
Because 2008 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Abarth OT. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Abarth OT | 2008 Jeep Wrangler | |
| Make | Abarth | Jeep |
| Model | OT | Wrangler |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1591 cc | 3960 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 154 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 8.8:1 |
| Top Speed | 220 km/hour | 169 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 790 kg | 1570 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3580 mm | 3890 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1750 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2380 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 72 L |
