1964 Abarth OT vs. 2009 Cadillac BLS
To start off, 2009 Cadillac BLS is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth OT would be higher. At 1,946 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Abarth OT is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac BLS weights approximately 825 kg more than 1964 Abarth OT.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Abarth OT | 2009 Cadillac BLS | |
| Make | Abarth | Cadillac |
| Model | OT | BLS |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1946 cc | 1910 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 148 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 1635 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3580 mm | 4690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2680 mm |
