1964 Abarth OT vs. 2009 Mazda 3
To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth OT would be higher. At 1,595 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Abarth OT (154 HP @ 7600 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 3. (104 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Abarth OT should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 3 weights approximately 395 kg more than 1964 Abarth OT.
Because 1964 Abarth OT is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Abarth OT. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Abarth OT | 2009 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Abarth | Mazda |
Model | OT | 3 |
Year Released | 1964 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1591 cc | 1595 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 154 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 78 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 68.5 mm | 83.6 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
Top Speed | 220 km/hour | 185 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 790 kg | 1185 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3580 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 55 L |