1964 Abarth OT vs. 2009 Mazda 6
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth OT would be higher. At 2,486 cc, 2009 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 6 (169 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1964 Abarth OT. (154 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1964 Abarth OT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 6 weights approximately 760 kg more than 1964 Abarth OT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1964 Abarth OT is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Abarth OT. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Abarth OT | 2009 Mazda 6 | |
| Make | Abarth | Mazda |
| Model | OT | 6 |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1591 cc | 2486 cc |
| Horse Power | 154 HP | 169 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 89 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 68.5 mm | 100 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.7:1 |
| Top Speed | 220 km/hour | 220 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 790 kg | 1550 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1800 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2730 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 64 L |
