1964 Abarth OT vs. 2009 Nissan Pixo
To start off, 2009 Nissan Pixo is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth OT would be higher. At 1,591 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Abarth OT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Abarth OT (154 HP) has 86 more horse power than 2009 Nissan Pixo. (68 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Abarth OT should accelerate faster than 2009 Nissan Pixo.
Because 1964 Abarth OT is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Abarth OT. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Pixo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Abarth OT | 2009 Nissan Pixo | |
Make | Abarth | Nissan |
Model | OT | Pixo |
Year Released | 1964 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1591 cc | 996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 154 HP | 68 HP |
Top Speed | 220 km/hour | 155 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3580 mm | 3580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2360 mm |