1964 Abarth OT vs. 2009 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2009 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth OT would be higher. At 2,488 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Nissan X-Trail (169 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1964 Abarth OT. (154 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1964 Abarth OT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Nissan X-Trail weights approximately 1526 kg more than 1964 Abarth OT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Nissan X-Trail is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Abarth OT. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Nissan X-Trail will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Abarth OT | 2009 Nissan X-Trail | |
Make | Abarth | Nissan |
Model | OT | X-Trail |
Year Released | 1964 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1591 cc | 2488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 154 HP | 169 HP |
Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.6:1 |
Top Speed | 220 km/hour | 191 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 790 kg | 2316 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3580 mm | 4640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2640 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 65 L |