1964 Abarth OT vs. 2010 Cadillac CTS-V
To start off, 2010 Cadillac CTS-V is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth OT would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Cadillac CTS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Cadillac CTS-V weights approximately 1105 kg more than 1964 Abarth OT.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Abarth OT | 2010 Cadillac CTS-V | |
| Make | Abarth | Cadillac |
| Model | OT | CTS-V |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1946 cc | 6200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 556 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 1915 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3580 mm | 4867 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1842 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1455 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2880 mm |
